Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/var/www/vhosts/austinbay.net/httpdocs/blog/wp-content/plugins/../../../../../../tmp/sessions/sess82388123.txt) is not within the allowed path(s): (/var/www/vhosts/austinbay.net/httpdocs:/tmp) in /var/www/vhosts/austinbay.net/httpdocs/blog/wp-settings.php on line 346

Warning: include(/tmp/sessions/index.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/vhosts/austinbay.net/httpdocs/blog/wp-content/themes/classic/index.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/tmp/sessions/index.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:') in /var/www/vhosts/austinbay.net/httpdocs/blog/wp-content/themes/classic/index.php on line 2
Austin Bay Blog » The White House Finally Focuses on Iraqi Reconstruction

Austin Bay Blog

12/7/2005

The White House Finally Focuses on Iraqi Reconstruction

Filed under: General — site admin @ 11:01 am

The White House is finally recognizing the efforts of the men and women who serve or have served in the C-9 (Civil Affairs) section of Multi-National Corps-Iraq– and for that matter, the workaholics in USAID. And the State Dept and Dept of Commerce economic advisers. And the Iraqis who man the bulldozers and cranes and run the plumbing. And a slew of contractors. And every US Army engineer and…you get the point, I hope.

I found this press release on the White House website. I’ll post the entire press release. The press release is supposed to background a speech by the President on Iraqi reconstruction. Bush needed to make this speech in September 2004, as the Battle of Najaf (August 2004) concluded. Or in February 2005, two or three weeks after the first Iraqi elections. Heck, he could have made it in June– I reported on reconstruction progress after my June trip to Iraq. Tsk. No, tsk isn’t harsh enough. This White House lets the military fight –that’s good. We don’t have micro-management. However, The White House is not on a war-footing. It has not waged the political and information battles this war demands, at least not consistently.

Still, this is an informative press release. Granted, “informative press release” is an oxymoron, like military intelligence, but peruse it. The White House needs to be prepared for the wave of “Yeah,but” stories which will highlight failures or shoddy construction or contractors-on-the-take. Refer the complainers to Eason Jordan, who worked out a deal with Saddam’s regime to keep his CNN bureau in Baghdad. Have them ask Eason about Saddam’s repair work. And his “palace construction program” — palaces paid for by Oil For Food.

December 7, 2005

Rebuilding Iraq

Today’s Presidential Action:

To Defeat The Enemy, The United States Is Helping Iraqis Rebuild. Over the course of this war, the Coalition has learned that winning the battle for Iraqi cities is only a first step. The Coalition has adjusted to win the “battle after the battle” by helping Iraqis consolidate their gains and keep the terrorists from returning.

Ø Iraqi Forces Are Securing Cities, Allowing For Targeted Reconstruction. As steady training produces more capable Iraqi Security Forces, those forces have been able to better hold onto the cities Iraqi and Coalition forces cleared together. With help from Coalition military and civilian personnel, the Iraqi government can then work with local leaders and residents to begin reconstruction – with Iraqis leading the building efforts and the Coalition playing a supporting role. This approach is working in cities like Najaf and Mosul.

Ø Iraqi And Coalition Forces Have Cleared And Are Holding The City Of Najaf. Ninety miles south of Baghdad, Najaf is home to one of Shia Islam’s holiest places – the Imam Ali Shrine. As a predominantly Shia city, Najaf suffered greatly during Saddam’s regime. About a year after U.S. troops liberated the city, it fell under the sway of a radical and violent militia. Fighting damaged homes and businesses, and the local economy collapsed as visitors and pilgrims stopped coming to the shrine out of fear for their lives. In the summer of 2004, the Iraqi government and Coalition decided to retake control of the city. Iraqi and Coalition forces rooted out the militia in tough, urban fighting. Together with the Iraqi government and the Shia clerical community, we forced the militia to abandon the shrine and return it to legitimate Iraqi authority. The militia committed to disarm and leave Najaf.

As Soon As The Fighting In Najaf Ended, Targeted Reconstruction Moved Forward. The Iraqi government played an active role, and so did our military commanders, diplomats, and workers from the U.S. Agency for International Development. Together, they worked with Najaf’s governor and other local officials to rebuild the local police force, repair residents’ homes, refurbish schools, restore water and other essential services, and reopen a soccer stadium. Fifteen months later, new businesses and markets have opened in some of Najaf’s poorest areas, religious pilgrims are visiting the city again, and construction jobs are putting local residents back to work. One of the largest projects was the rebuilding of the Najaf Teaching Hospital, which had been looted and turned into a military fortress by the militia. Thanks to efforts by Iraqi doctors and local leaders, with the help of American personnel, the hospital is now open and capable of serving hundreds of patients each day.

· Najaf Has Made Tremendous Progress. Najaf is now in the hands of elected government officials. An elected provincial council is at work drafting plans to bring more tourism and commerce to the city. Political life has returned, and campaigns for the upcoming elections have begun, with different parties competing for votes. The Iraqi police are now responsible for day-to-day security. An Iraqi battalion has assumed control of the former American military base, and American forces are now about 40 minutes outside the city. There is still plenty of work to be done. Sustaining electric power remains a major challenge, and construction has begun on three new substations to help boost capacity. To address a clean water shortage, new water treatment and sewage units are being installed. Security has improved dramatically, but threats remain. Local leaders and Iraqi Security Forces are working to resolve these problems – and Americans are helping.

Ø Iraqi And American Forces Have Cleared And Are Holding The City Of Mosul. Mosul is one of Iraq’s largest cities and home to a diverse population of Sunni Arabs, Kurds, and other ethnic groups. It was here that American troops brought justice to Saddam’s sons in the summer of 2003. Mosul was relatively quiet in the months after liberation, and American forces began to redeploy elsewhere in the country. Then, the enemy infiltrated the city, and by late last year, they had gained control of much of Mosul. American and Iraqi forces responded with a series of coordinated strikes on the most dangerous parts of the city and killed, captured, and cleared out many of the terrorists and Saddamists. Over time, the Iraqi police and legitimate political leaders regained control. As Iraqis have grown in strength and ability, they have taken more responsibility for the city’s security, and Coalition forces have moved into a supporting role.

· After The Security Situation Improved, Reconstruction Accelerated. Local Iraqi leaders, with Coalition support, upgraded key roads and bridges over the Tigris River, rebuilt schools and hospitals, and started refurbishing the Mosul Airport. Police stations and firehouses were rebuilt, and Iraqis have made major improvements in the city’s water and sewage network. But real challenges still remain. Because the city is not receiving enough electricity, Iraqis have a major new project underway to expand the Mosul power substation. Terrorist intimidation is still a concern, but turnout for the October referendum was over 50 percent in the province where Mosul is located – more than triple the turnout in the January election.

Ø With Progress, Serious Challenges Are Being Addressed. Corruption exists at both the national and local levels of the Iraqi government. Fraud will not be tolerated, so the American Embassy in Baghdad is helping to demand transparency and accountability for the money being invested in reconstruction. Another problem is the infiltration of militia groups into the Iraqi Security Forces – especially the Iraqi police. We are helping Iraqis deal with this problem by embedding Coalition transition teams in Iraqi units to mentor police and soldiers. In a free Iraq, former militia members must shift their loyalty to the national government and learn to operate under the rule of law.

The United States Is Working With Iraq’s Leaders To Build A Sound Economy That Will Deliver A Better Life For Iraqis. Iraq is a nation with the potential for tremendous prosperity. The country has a young and educated workforce, abundant land and water, and among the largest oil resources in the world. Yet for decades, Saddam Hussein used Iraq’s wealth to enrich himself and a privileged few and neglected the country’s infrastructure and economy. The Coalition is helping the new Iraqi government reverse decades of economic destruction, reinvigorate its economy, and make responsible reforms. With Coalition help, the Iraqis are rebuilding infrastructure and establishing the institutions of a market economy. The entrepreneurial spirit is strong. A free Iraq will be built by the free people of Iraq – and the United States is proud to help.

· Reconstruction Efforts Are Focused On Local Projects That Deliver Rapid And Noticeable Improvements. The Coalition’s approach to helping Iraqis rebuild has changed and improved with time. When the reconstruction process was first begun in the spring of 2003, the focus was on building large-scale infrastructure – such as electrical plants and water treatment facilities. This approach was not meeting the priorities of the Iraqi people. In many places, the most urgent needs were smaller, localized projects like sewer lines and city roads. In consultation with the Iraqi government, resources started to be used to fund smaller, local projects that could deliver rapid, noticeable improvements. American military commanders were given more money for flexible use, and the Coalition worked with Iraqi leaders to provide more contracts to Iraqi firms. By adapting reconstruction efforts, the United States is now better able to help Iraqi leaders serve their people.

Ø Together, Iraqis And Americans Are Making Progress. Reconstruction has not always gone as well as hoped – primarily because of the security challenges. Rebuilding a nation devastated by a dictator is a large undertaking – even harder when terrorists attempt to destroy gains. Yet, in the space of two and a half years, the United States has helped Iraqis conduct nearly 3,000 renovation projects at schools, train more than 30,000 teachers, distribute more than 8 million textbooks, rebuild irrigation infrastructure to help more than 400,000 rural Iraqis, and improve drinking water for more than 3 million people. The Coalition has helped Iraqis introduce a new currency, reopen their stock exchange, and extend $21 million in micro-credit and small business loans. As a result of these efforts and Iraq’s newfound freedom, more than 30,000 new Iraqi businesses have registered since liberation, and according to a recent survey, more than three-quarters of Iraqi business owners anticipate growth in the economy over the next two years. This economic development and growth will be key to addressing the high unemployment rate across many parts of the country. In addition, Iraqis have negotiated significant debt relief and completed an economic report card with the International Monetary Fund – a signal that Iraqis are serious about reform.

Victory In Iraq

The United States Will Settle For Nothing Less Than Complete Victory In Iraq. Withdrawing on an artificial deadline would endanger the American people, harm our military, and make the Middle East less stable. It would also give the terrorists exactly what they want. The al-Qaida leader Zawahiri recently wrote to the terrorist Zarqawi in Iraq, and he cited the Vietnam War as a reason to believe the terrorists can prevail. The terrorists think they can make America run in Iraq; the terrorists hope America will withdraw before the job is done – so they can take over the country and turn it into a base for future attacks. America will not yield the future of Iraq to men like Zarqawi, nor will it yield the future of the Middle East to men like bin Laden.

Ø Building Democracy In Iraq Will Establish A Peaceful Civil Society That Is An Ally In The War On Terror. Free societies are peaceful societies, and democracies do not attack each other. Free nations give their citizens a path to resolve their differences peacefully through the democratic process. Democracy can be difficult, complicated, and even chaotic. Iraqis have to overcome many challenges, including longstanding ethnic and religious tensions, and the legacy of decades of brutal repression. But they are learning that democracy is the only way to build a just and peaceful society – because it is the only system that gives every citizen a voice in determining their future.

UPDATE: Please consider voting for this site in the Web Logs awards. (A belated thank you for the email from Nebraska alerting me to the competition.)

4 Comments »

  1. So far the reconstruction efforts mostly have been fruitless. Your wording suggests that you too wonder how a press release will change that. Maybe you should wait for the release that reports oil or electricity production finally returning to prewar levels, or crime dropping to prewar levels. ED NOTE: I have been to Iraq, twice. Reconstruction is taking place. The easy dismissal of effort –successful effort– in this comment’s first sentence is disturbing, but all too typical of a mindset. “Fruitless” — don’t think so if you’re an Iraqi who wants sewers that function. In southwest Baghdad (in a battalion sector I visited several times) that was the local politics– getting a sewer that functioned. Saddam and his corrupt regime neglected the neighborhood because the folks living there were Shia. We started working on the plumbing– the US military and Iraqi contractors. “Fruitless?” Pish. Difficult but not fruitless. Probably a multi-year job to do it right, but wasn’t begun until Saddam was toppled. My post wonders at the Bush Administration’s less-than-stellar track record for focusing on warfighting–laments its failure to fight the political battles against defeatists like Howard Dean. I have also commented on oil production reports (search the site, read the columns) and have followed eletrical generation since Fall 2003. (Had a column addressing electricity and a school program in Fall 2003– should still be up at strategypage.) As for crime dropping– what an indicative comment. Saddam’s government was a crime. His government fell– so one form of crime, totalitarian crime, has dropped precipitously.

    Comment by Jonathan Goodman — 12/7/2005 @ 1:38 pm

  2. If a press statement is released, but the press ignores it, was a press statement actually released?? You can find quite a number of speeches, press statements, and papers by President Bush, and the administration about the goals, strategy, plans in Iraq. You mostly have to find them on the White House servers, because the press either ignores them, nit-picks them, or mischaracterizes them to such an extent that they have no basis in what was released. Take this release from April 4, 2003 by Dr Rice. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/04/20030404-12.html

    Our goals are clear: We will help Iraqis build an Iraq that is whole, free and at peace with itself and with its neighbors; an Iraq that is disarmed of all WMD; that no longer supports or harbors terror; that respect the rights of Iraqi people and the rule of law; and that is on the path to democracy.

    Comment by Keith, Indy — 12/7/2005 @ 2:05 pm

  3. […] nth ago, Instapundit linked to an Austin Bay post headed (rather ironically in retrospect) The White House Finally Gets Serious About Iraqi Reconstruction. So, now that the nature of “seriousness&# […]

    Pingback by John Quiggin » Blog Archive » Defining victory down, part 2 (Crossposted at CT) — 1/10/2006 @ 2:58 pm

  4. […] nth ago, Instapundit linked to an Austin Bay post headed (rather ironically in retrospect) The White House Finally Gets Serious About Iraqi Reconstruction. So, now that the nature of “seriousness&# […]

    Pingback by Crooked Timber » » Defining victory down, part 2 — 1/10/2006 @ 3:00 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress